The boundary
These come from live research on the web: the company’s own site, its careers page, its newsroom, news coverage and business listings. Each finding carries the links the research worked from, so you can check it.
That a company with this shape, at this moment, probably has this need. A good researcher makes inferences like this all the time. They’re still probabilities, so we mark them as inferred everywhere they appear.
If the research can’t point at evidence for a finding, the finding is shown as inferred or unobservable, never as confirmed.
No dataset records any of this. You find it out by talking to them.
When triage says no, the account is marked discarded and the reason is stored. Nothing is deleted, so you can always see what was ruled out and why, as well as what survived.
Representative record. Hover a column to pause it; hover a struck row for its reason. The ids, the survivor share and the reason grammar are the product’s; the rows are illustrations, not client data.
We narrow a market of a thousand companies to a few dozen worth your attention, with the reasoning attached. You find out the rest by asking them.
So LeadAtomic doesn’t qualify accounts for you. It makes qualifying quick: each researched account carries its reasoning, so you can rule most of them out in minutes instead of calling round to find out.
A penetration-testing firm replied to our outreach with: “Are you referring toprospects as leads? What makes them a lead? If those are just prospects, we aren’t interested.”
They were right. We were using a word that implies somebody has shown interest, and nobody in those accounts had. So we changed the site, and wrote this page so the boundary is stated before anyone has to ask.
That is what we can give you. Signing up is free and needs no card.